LocoFoco
Politics • Spirituality/Belief • Writing
Where the curious freedom-minded "responsibilitarians" go to rethink and regroup in this strange age of transformations. The LocoFoco Netcast is at the center of our preoccupation, and here is where We of the LocoFoco aim to ready ourselves to strike our matches and light up the beacon of liberty.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Learn more first
November 06, 2020
The Dialectics of Ideologies

Few ideologies are granitic. Are any?

Marxian socialism billed itself as anti-capitalist all the way through its transit of memes, starting out in the Communist Manifesto advocating policies that we all live by, today; boasting, of course, of the ultimate stateless society, but accepting the necessity of “the dictatorship of the proletariat,” which proved to be what it sounded like, totalitarian tyranny; but that could not sustain a complex consumer economy, so forms of heavy dirigisme and even mercantilism were fallen back upon, leading to the practice of “state capitalism” that can be called “state socialism” and even “market socialism,” none of which look like in practice the theory as propounded previously. So Marxians end up being post-Marxians or neo-Marxists or what-have-you, and Gramsci and the Frankfurters cooked up a “cultural” variant using the politics of division and cultural group warfare, to establish a socialist state.

And, post-Jon Stewart (the most influential political figure of our time on this issue), progressives began defending transfer state dirigisme as “socialism” rather than defend it (as was previously done) “democratic.”

In every step of the above are lies and evasions.

But the arc of any ideological transit changes what the ideology “is.”

Nationalism starts out anti-imperialist, but sometimes morphs into some variant of imperialism (the U.S. and Nazi Germany, for example). When a person calls himself a nationalist, are they embracing the anti-empire or the pro-/neo-empire position? Figure that one out, because most self-proclaimed nationalists do not seem to know.

And with nationalism, it’s kind of interesting: in a globalist context, with cosmopolitans trying to set up a world government through vast treaty entanglements, nationalism can serve as a buffer, a more-local defense of sovereignty to usurpations by large bodies, whether they be China, the U.N., or … the U.S. foreign policy establishment, all of which have imperialist flavors.

On this side of nationalism, there is federalism — the foundation for the American “experiment” — and other forms of anti-imperialism and anti-nationalism.

And since everyone in politics makes allegiances, you will often find nationalists making alliances with this imperialist or that, that federalist and this.

Which means that using any of these terms as a set focus of opprobrium is problematic.

I have it easier, though: I am on the far side away from socialism, so whichever form it takes, I’m against it. And I’m against all imperialisms, too.

Though I try not to let that crows out my understanding of the play of empires in the past, and their role in setting up modernity.

Think dialectically, I think Chris Matthew Sciabarra might say.

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Learn more first
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
September 26, 2021
Beyond the Slave State – and Quora!

Dennis Pratt and I conclude our conversation from last week. He talks about his next big project, a bus tour. Sounds fun. And he talks more about Quora.

And then I, your humble LocoFocovian, provide you a sample Quora Q&A. The A is mine.

This video will only appear here, on LocoFoco.Locals.com.

00:10:02
December 18, 2020
I might have a book or two, too
00:00:11
December 08, 2020
The Panic of 1893
00:00:32
October 05, 2021
The Chinese Curse

This week's podcast features Paul "Term Limits" Jacob. Paul is president of the Liberty Initiative Fund, and publishes commentary every day at ThisIsCommonSense.org.

This episode is an echo (crossover podcast) with Paul's podcast "This Week in Common Sense."

The Chinese Curse
Life Under the Panic

Another out-take from my conversation with Stephan Kinsella.

We muse on life under pandemic and panic.

Life Under the Panic
Talking UFOs with Stephan Kinsella, Esq., Skeptic

An outtake from episode 21 of the LocoFoco Netcast! Only for folks on this platform.

Talking UFOs with Stephan Kinsella, Esq., Skeptic
wirkman.com

This year I put my blog on ice.

For the foreseeable future, I'll blog here.

post photo preview
November 19, 2022
As so many against the left

…turn to God, I remain where I have been for a long time. Godless. But fascinated.

The more I read of the origins and developments of our major religions — Judaism and Christianity specifically — the less credence I give to them, but the more fascinating they become. Also, as alien as the dogmas and rites seem to me now, I am beginning to understand their utility. Exaptation complicates things, even so far as to commend to me the notion that the evangelical atheists are ineluctably reckless and foolish.

We constitute a funny species.

November 18, 2022
Bankman-Fried and the non-Mystery of the Scam
post photo preview
The Devil Is Dead
Timothy Virkkala on the meaning of Nick Fuentes’s stardom.

I had hoped to blithely scribble my last page and be laid onto my final satin pillow never having dealt with Nick Fuentes. 

I’d heard snippets of the twenty-something yap about Hitler being “cool” and Stalin “a great man of history,” so why desire to explore his mind further? But he’s going mainstream, hitting the biggest of the half-disgraced-media-stars’ podcasts, Tucker Carlson and now Mr. Morgan. So here we are.

It is said to be a generational thing, whether you think Piers Morgan or Nick Fuentes “won” the interview on Piers’s podcast last week. But I know young people who thought Nick lost and old people who thought he won handily.

The point, however, is not that Mr. Fuentes won, but that Piers Morgan lost. 

He went into the interview aiming to milk every “gotcha” possible, making Fuentes repudiate past statements or pin him as an evil “racist” and “sexist” and “misogynist” if he wouldn’t.

Piers had unhinged himself from any objectivity, so committed was he to his objective of destroying. And failed.

Why?

Piers doesn’t realize how the values he holds — of being anti-racist and anti-sexist, etc. — are now on shaky ground. Progressives and liberals and centrists have all school-marmed these topics so much and with so little precision (and no generosity) that the young men of Nick Fuentes’s generation are, apparently, over it. Completely.

The dominant moral paradigm since World War II has been unified by treating Hitler as the Devil — that and a general self-congratulatory pride in not being racist and sexist and such. Yes, Hitler was put down: a great success. Yes, the subjugation of the Negroes was ended: the Civil Rights movement won. Bigly. But Nick just smirks. “Sure I’m racist,” apparently earnestly meaning that he’s not complying with the old rite: ask forgiveness for every joke or hyperbole made against the Hitler’s The Devil cult.

Nick’s excuse is the current (and inarguable) context: a post-war ideological consensus that ended in persecuting — or, at least, continual denigration of and discrimination against — young white men, especially young Christian white men.

In this context all the accusations amount to nothing. They are wet noodles instead of the flails as in days of yore, in the days of the Silents and the Boomers. “The Age of Man is over; the Age of the Orc has begun,” rung through my mind as Nick Fuentes smirked his superiority over the old scold Piers. 

Being a moralistic Grundy no longer cuts it, Piers. You have to acknowledge more devils, come up with coherent policy, and address interviewees — even those you loathe — with a hint of respect.

The Age of the Anti-Hitler is over; the Age of the Anti-Woke has begun.

We could have asked for a better bellwether. But it’s not up to us individually. I was over the Age of Anti-Hitler decades ago, and have been weaning myself off the moral preening about race and misogyny for years now. There are more devils and better issues. But what we’re left with at the moment is Nick Fuentes smirking over the limp-witted Ms. Grundy, Piers Morgan.

Read full Article
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals